A Professional Second Opinion

I understand it is much much more comfortable to go to friends to go boyfriends girlfriends anybody whatever I once had a young man come in and he gave me his essay and it was very very very bland and I was trying to be very politic and ask him how he’d gone about working on it and I turned to him and I said has anyone else had the opportunity to look at this and he said my mom and my girlfriend so then I developed the rule not someone who loves you they already think you’re great they’re not your best critic okay. You can also find help for your application on Robotdon.

So definitely a prof somebody close very close to the topic I hear students say well all you need is an english prof and a grad student or a postdoc well i’ll tell you english prof may not know everything about graduate school and the stem sciences or what our admission committee wants to know a graduate student may have two or three years experience a professor may have 20 to 30 you make the pic when somebody said do it this way they may have been admitted but it doesn’t mean they know that their application was perfect or what the strengths and the weaknesses were because there are a multitude of other ways to write it I caution you in the same way about picking graduate programs great universities great programs which programs will look best on your record with your grades and your GRE scores and again email me up the site if you’d like more information about that had a situation just a year ago where there was a student who at another institution who had applied to graduate school and the director of his program made recommendations that he applied here here and here he met with me and I recommended that he apply here here and here.

And actually because his research was very interdisciplinary there were a number of different routes to go that were really great instead the individual applied to only immunology programs only in the state in which he resided and he wasn’t admitted to any of them and we went back to him and said why you know you know you don’t have to take our advice but we’re really curious why did you not and they said well I gathered all of this advice but the postdoc in the lab told me only to apply it to immunology and I’m positive that the postdocs intentions were golden but a postdoc has four years of graduate school and professor has 30 years at the bench so think long and hard about who you should be taking advice from so again if you have questions you can write me at this email address that this is the same email address that the emails on this website go to I hope this has been helpful if you have any questions write me if there’s information that’s missing right me because I can go on back and incorporate it and hopefully make this more beneficial for all of you.

Essay and Grammar Check

As your essay becomes more readable we teach in business writing no indentation indentation is gone it’s out of fashion nobody indents anymore but for this essay or for the purpose of your b-school admissions you must indent your Asus Edusson nz suggest I would you know you can you know make the lines draw the lines but I would love if you can do it without the lines that looks a little better it looks a little more professional the lines look a little more childish so if you can’t absolutely manage if you have a big problem with your with your skewness then you draw the lines but I would love it if you have a slight problem manage without the lines here but even in the plane therefore you must do the indentation.

So this is about this structure guys so guys for today’s takeaway like I told you earlier you are evaluating such a swath okay yeah I’ll come to this points as well in just a minute when I am evaluating an essay I’m talking about content I of course look at the body and and the meat of arresting I look at your cuttings I look at your grammar I look at your commas and full stops I look at your spelling mistakes as well that’s your return ability and I look at this structure so for the purpose of the z-test tomorrow and for the purpose of all your essays in future.

You must divide your essay into the introduction paragraph between two to six paragraphs for the body each paragraph has a distinct flavor and a conclusion paragraph summarizing what you have said couple of more points the conclusion paragraph is where you take the stand so for example if the topic was like we did for democracy and you talk about pros and cons of democracy you divide your body into two paragraphs one for pros one for cons in the conclusion paragraph I would take the stand so taking a stand doesn’t happen in the introduction it happens in the conclusion it is where you summarize that having seen the pros and cons we can summarize democracy is or is not the best form of governance this is your conclusion okay so in a question mark based topic the stand always happens in the conclusion.

Okay I don’t know please don’t do that please don’t do the highlighting and the underlining don’t don’t do those things so that’s one answer shush with your question generally I don’t know if you guys agree with me for 300 words I guess nobody fell short nobody when I said time up plus anybody still writing I I guess for 300 words the time was more than enough please tell me if anybody thinks different here was the time enough was it too short 20 minutes for 300 words you were free right before the time was up that will always be the case without exception you will always get more time and the space required or the space that you got for in-state there is a very simple reason for this such worth because initially you’re not supposed to start.


Book vs Movie from online writing service

Even though this film version of the book was silent, I could still tell what was happening in the movie due to the fact that I watched the movie as I read the book to be able to compare and interpret what was going on. The film and the book were actually very similar indeed.

This is probably because the movie was silent and the director had to portray it more accurately to the book. However there were some differences between the book and the movie. One of the major differences is how each medium portrays the characters differently. In the book, Dr. Jekyll is portrayed as more of a scholarly character or a “doctor” but in the movie he is portrayed as a “crazy scientist. ” I like that the author did this though because it made the movie more exciting as opposed to the book.

Read another essay of book: The Faerie Ring by online writing service

Utterson is also portrayed differently. In the book he is portrayed as a more honest character than in the movie. Mr. Utterson advises Dr. Jekyll against some of his actions in the book much more than he does in the movie, but again, the director does this for dramatic effect. The way Mr. Hyde is portrayed in the movie is very accurate though. The movie shows Mr. Hyde as truly being a monster just as in the book. The only difference is that in the movie, the transformation of Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde is much more dramatic.

The movie shows the transformation as being extremely gruesome and dramatic whereas in the book the transformation was more gradual and less extreme. Overall, I liked the book more than the movie, even though both were kind of boring and I couldn’t quite understand the book either. The author could have written the book in a more exciting fashion because quite often I would daze off as I was reading and would miss vital parts of the book. However, I thought the movie was worse because it was silent and the only sound playing was the eerie background music. I also didn’t like the fact that it was a very old, black and white movie.

Essay of Graduate Study Challenges and Strategies for Success

The words “Running head:” must be included in the running head on the title page only. Graduate Study Challenges and Strategies for Success Mark Baravik HCS/504 September 3rd, 2010 Jill Grundy Graduate Study Challenges and Strategies for Success Graduate education is a decision, which must not be taken lightly. It Reword – Do not begin a sentence with the word “it”.  is an important goal I took after; I had to understand all plusses and minuses of this exiting journey. Decisions should be made after serious consideration of personal and professional goals (Kramer, 2007).

Graduate education involves in it itself multiple challenges, which require an individual to come up with strategies to overcome this problems to succeed. Some of the obstacles that I may anticipate while completing my education are: difficulties with family especially children, work, and procrastination. Good introduction. Family is a challenge of an emotional kind. These There  are most important people in my life, [remove comma] for whom I want to give everything I can: better school or daycare, clothing, house, life Add comma (Use commas between items in a series.

Read next: The Faerie Ring by online writing service

Place a comma before “and” in a series) and so on. In my culture Add comma (Use a comma to set off most introductory elements)people say that if a child has a better life than a parent than the parent’s life was not wasted. In addition [insert comma] higher education in nursing is an expensive commodity, but it already brought lots of happiness and success to my life, Use period instead of a comma. I look for ward forward  to learning and growing with my family. Family is very demanding part of my life, around which it revolves.

So the challenge is: how would steel  be there for them and keep my educational obligations. When I was about to apply to the FNP Use abbreviations only after writing the term or name in full, with the abbreviation in parentheses—e. g. , Return on Investment (ROI), Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). program, my wife and I spoke about this very topic. We have decided that our daily living would revolve on time management and teamwork. Specific goals were set and we decided up on tentative plan of action, change to a semicolon it would be a fluid process based on open communication and time management.

I take all the time when our children are in daycare on days that I am not at work to study. Two to three hours each day after the children go to bed are given to homework. And so that we would not lose our sanity two weekends a month are devoted to family entirely. In formal writing do not begin a sentence with “And” or “But. ” These words make your writing seem too informal and conversational. Because the process being an ever-changing plan if there is time becomes available outside of the plan it would be used for family or education depending on circumstances.

In addition my wife is my primary support system, semicolon we are each other’s spotter. All of the decisions, schedules, to do to-do list lists, and time management are done together: we are a team. Second very important challenge of graduate learner is a full-time job. It provides recourses to sustain my family, but it is the biggest time taker and energy drainer. Please, do not misunderstand I like my job very much, but in addition it is a source of stress. Sometimes I feel like I am leading double life.

One of these two lives is at work being a nurse with procedures, patients, doctors and nurses; concentrating on common goal. At the same time a second life of a graduate student, who locks himself in the office plugs in his laptop and prays that the pager or a telephone would not go off. Like a support system at home I needed to create one at work. I have built a good working relationship with my immediate supervisor by keeping open lines of communication. Happy A happy manager is an informed manager and because she knows that work is being done she does not mind seeing me reading read.

I, the student can find some quiet time for reading and research. My motto at work is: an unlimited supply of favors to all, try not to say “no”  and at the same time do not let anybody to take advantage of me. People see and feel goodwill, and most try to repay with same. I try to avoid politics and conflicts like a plague because they drain time and increase stress. It all comes down to time management, planning out my day.The third and final challenge of my academic carrier and educational sin is procrastination.

According to Finnigan (2008), “There is no way for you to sit down and, as in the famous advertising slogan, “Just do it,” Nike’s slogan. You need to mention where the slogan came from and the intermittent realization of this apparent fact tends to make any work seem rather pointless or futile, thus heightening the attraction of other more pleasant or practicable diversions” (p. 5). I often catch myself, putting off assignments, drifting away in a daydream or an idea, which is not relevant to the subject.

It turns in to a major problem when situation involves a deadline. I tend to press on during final hours before a deadline to complete an assignment. To combat this problem, I pay close attention to deadlines. I keep a calendar, which is synchronized with my phone, my home page, and work schedule. Thankfully technology sends me reminders and keeps me on track. Occasionally I would move a deadline closer by one or two days, sort of a white lie strategy, which helps if an assignment is specially difficult.

In conclusion all this cChallenges are the parts of one broad skill of time management. This is an indispensable skill for a graduate student and professional alike. An ability to organize properly ones time greatly impacted by the success level of the project. According to Misra and McKean (2000), “Time management behaviors had a greater buffering effect on academic stress than leisure satisfaction activities. Important relationships were found between some aspects of time management and academic stress” (p. 8). Your paper will benefit from a stronger conclusion. A concluding paragraph summarizes the main idea, ties the main points together neatly for the reader, and ends with a sense of finality. Avoid introducing new ideas in the conclusion.  The acronym SEES may help you write a better paragraph. S = Short sentence that states the main idea. E = Explanation of the main idea in more detail. E = Example or quotation given to illustrate the main idea. S = Sum up the main idea in a way that leads to the next paragraph. References Finigan, T. (2008). Expect Delaysdelays: Procrastination and the Graduate graduate Studentstudent. English Studies in Canada, 34(2/3), 4-10. Kramer, L. (2007). A personal reflection: graduate Graduate study challenges and strategies for success. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 26(4), 158-159. Misra, R. , & McKean, M. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41.

Book Review: The Elizabeth Smart case. Payment for patience.

Rating: 5 stars

I became interested in this author after seeing her speak about eyewitness memory on the Oprah Winfrey Show. I found the book, read it and then noticed a composite drawing in the Elizabeth Smart case that seemed to bear no likeness to the man arrested for the kidnapping. Finally, I decided to write my review for the famous essay writing service and publish here.

Jeanne Boylan’s name was periodically associated with the case and I felt let down that she’d so badly erred in doing the less than stellar drawing. (Though now we know that the man was caught because the Smart family realized his religious name, announced it to the public and then were given real photos by the man’s own family that were aired on TV which then resulted in his subsequent identification and quick arrest.)

Now, in more recent news reports, I found out that Jeanne Boylan actually interviewed the younger sister of Elizabeth about her memory of the abduction night and that the poor suspect drawing the media was showing was not from her interviews, but was from a local portrait person and was not taken from the little sister’s sighting the night of the abduction but rather was taken from the family who knew the man and had spent many hours with him. Now I understood why the discrepancy.

I felt relief. I momentarily thought Jeanne Boylan had lost her skills. Now I understand the difference between her interview and the drawing that is now linked to the case but does not look like the kidnapper.

I look forward to the sequel of ‘Portraits of Guilt‘ and to reading more about what happens to eyewitnesses memories when the sightings are endured during moments of fright and fear and how that forces their vision very deep into the recesses of their mind as it did for Elizabeth’s little sister.

Praise the Lord that with help and encouragement, Elizabeth’s little sister finally remembered the religious name with the help of the loving Smart family, the apparently astute police and Jeanne Boylan who all had fiercely guarded the young child’s evolving memory while it was gradually surfacing so that the kidnapper was finally caught. Good things come to those who wait!

The Faerie Ring by online writing service

Publisher: Tor Teen

Release date: September 27, 2011

Pages: 352

Summary: Tiki lives on the street, picking pockets daily to try and stay alive. When she accidentally steals an important ring from the Queen of England, she finds herself in the middle of a centuries-old conflict involving faeries—mythical creatures who are as beautiful as they are deadly.

My thoughts: The Faerie Ring reads very much like a fairy tale itself. Kiki Hamilton, as a professional essay writing service, easily sweeps the reader away into the slums of London circa 1871, a vivid setting that manages to seem slightly romantic once we’re introduced to the street children. From there, Hamilton steers her story straight into non-stop adventure. It’s nearly impossible to put The Faerie Ring down; the world is so richly built that upon reading, you feel as if you’re actually a part of it. Because Hamilton’s version of the late 1800’s is so fascinating (and exciting), it’s difficult to stop thinking about it for hours after you’ve stopped reading.

Tiki is an incredibly solid heroine; there isn’t one part of her to dislike. She’s lost everything, but she still makes it her mission to take care of a group of street children (all of which are adorable and fun, by the way). Tiki’s generosity makes her admirable, but her fierce determination and loyalty make her lovable. Plus, Tiki’s thief mentality makes her incredibly amusing—she gets herself into trouble quite easily, but the ways she gets herself out are quite clever.

The Faerie Ring features Tiki as its central protagonist, but there are actually two other main characters, both of which are just as strong as Tiki. The first is Leopold, who serves to provide another perspective on the central conflict in the story, and the second is Rieker, a mysterious figure who completely turns the bad-boy stereotype on its head. Both of these men are fabulous characters, but Rieker especially stands out for his complexity and humorous attitude.

With its lush writing, highly detailed setting and instantly lovable characters, The Faerie Ring will enchant everyone who reads it. The essay has such an adventurous quality to it that you’ll be sucked in immediately, and the suspense of not knowing what happens next will keep you hooked. Kiki Hamilton’s fabulous debut is perfect for fans of historical fantasy. Highly recommended it to you!

4.5/5 stars

The Name of the Wind – Patrick Rothfuss

I just finished reading The Name of the Wind for the second time. It’s that good. As the cover proudly proclaims, it won a Quill award, whatever that is. This is one of those books that has gotten positive reviews damn near everywhere but it’s worth talking about one more time out of sheer admiration. It’s simply one of the best fantasy books I have ever read.

If I were doing a writer review, Rothfuss would fall amongst the greats and not just in the fantasy genre. The reviews you read on this particular masterpiece naturally compare him to Tolkien. His writing style glows with metaphor, natural dialog and that rare gift of environmental awareness that has the ability to put you in the scene with the hero Kvothe. I think he comes close to Hemingway and Vonnegut in these critical elements of writing.

What I love about the book is that it carries you along with the main character throughout the entire tale. It does not split into multiple parts every three chapters funneling you down an off ramp to a new group of characters right when the story was getting good. Kvothe is interesting enough to have a Dos Equis commercial made about him. He doesn’t need a supporting cast to draw attention away from him.

The other strength of the book is how quickly it establishes the villain of the tale. The Chandrian is the mystical evil baseline that drives Kvothe to become the most interesting man in the world. In true master style, Rothfuss only feeds you tidbits about who and what the Chandrian might be. Every new tidbit leaves you longing for more. Kvothe makes his share of enemies along the way but none hold the captivity of the immortal or supernatural that the Chandrian does.

He also does a great job of keeping the number of characters in the book manageable. This is not always the case in fantasy – Tolkien being the worst of the lot.  There is something to be said about creating a deep and immersive world based on story and character development – there is something else to be said about turning it into Mr. Miller’s History Lecture. Rothfuss keeps the small roles small and to the point. They accomplish what they are meant to without any obligation to somehow include the personal history of everyone the hero meets. Tolkien was a genius but you get the sense that he was a bit of a blowhard. Rothfuss happily shrugs off this part of Tolkien’s legacy.

He also treats magic, or sympathy, like science. I couldn’t help but lap this up. He has a way of bringing this into the story that allows you to peer behind the scenes in a logical fashion that makes the reader believe that if you were a character in the story, you might have a shot at being a sympathy master yourself. It’s magic for the layman but not insulting in anyway. It’s like reading about physics as described by Hawkins. He doesn’t assume that you can solve the Schrodinger equation yourself, but he has the passion to describe why solving such a thing can be so damn cool.

I can’t wait for the next installment.

“The Big Trip Up Yonder” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr

“The Big Trip Up Yonder,” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. is a short stories originally published in 1959 by Galaxy Science Fiction. Though I read it in The Fourth Science Fiction Megapack.

It takes place in the year 2185, where a substance known as Anti-Gerasone has effectively stopped everyone from aging. The characters are made up of the members of the Ford family, headed by their patriarch Gramps. And though all of them are over the age of seventy-five, they all appear to be around the age of thirty.

The exception to the above statement is Gramps, who was seventy when the medication was first distributed. Though he’s well over a hundred by the start of the story, having not aged another day since starting the drug.

The world of the story is one without privacy, where the family all sits around watching a giant TV. The story revolves around the characters and their desire to be named the beneficiary of Gramps will, a power the old man wields frequently and dramatically. Gramps however has something else up his sleeve, and so begins the humorous destruction and odd end for the Ford family.

There’s a line in Woody Allen’s Everyone Says I Love You, that kept popping into my head. In a scene Alan Alda’s character, who is a liberal, is arguing at dinner with his conservative son. He cries out at last, “Somebody get me my will and an eraser!”  Which is one of my favorite all time Allen lines, and is pretty much the crux the story at hand.

That also pushed the author’s cameo in Rodney Dangerfield’s film Back to School in my head. If you haven’t seen it, Dangerfield hires Vonnegut to write a paper for a class he’s taking. The subject, Vonnegut himself. However when he shows up after the paper he wrote gets an F, Dangerfield yells at him, “Screw you Vonnegut,” and slams the door in his face.

“The Big Trip Up Yonder, ” speaks to the direction Vonnegut saw the world heading. His vision of the future when he wrote it in 1959? Giant televisions, no privacy, wealth only available through inheritance and a youth/media obsessed culture. Not far off good sir.

He also notes that an event in the story is watched by 500 million people on the Eastern Seaboard. For comparison, there are only 313 million people living in the entire United States today. But he wasn’t predicting 2013, he was predicting 2185. According to the UN’s massively wordy, H.G. Wells citing report, the population in 2300 could be as low as 2.3 billion, or as high as 36.4 billion. It was published in 2004, and suggests a middle ground with leveling off that would keep the population at around 9 billion.

So who knows? Maybe Vonnegut will be right about the population too. We’ll find out in 180 years.

The Age of Zeus – James Lovegrove

Lovegrove’s Age of Zeus is an interesting blend between science fiction and fantasy but I would still place it firmly within the science fiction genre. With the adolescent Riordan Olympus taking center stage on both the best seller lists and the silver screen, it’s nice to see a mature rendering of these ancient legends. This is my first attempt at a Lovegrove work and I was pleasantly surprised at how he turns a phrase.

The central concept is that the Gods of Olympus are back. It is unclear at first whether or not they have always been here and in hiding or if their arrival is a recent thing. As expected, the gods wreak havoc on the international governments until all that remain are those willing to submit to them. The Tony Blair’s of the world justify this by pointing out that global war has vanished along with the majority of crime and most of the world’s suffering. And all it cost was subjugation of the human race to these in-the-flesh gods.

I especially loved this point at a time when freedom often takes a back seat to national security, at least in the U S of A. It’s amazing how many people I speak to that are willing to sacrifice the simple freedoms bestowed on us by the constitution and the bill of rights for the potential of being a little more safe. The most common argument I run across is one of profiling. It scares me how many people are willing to flout the fourth amendment’s protections against unreasonable search and seizures for the chance to profile and molest those with a Middle Eastern tilt. Those that are willing to give up these freedoms seem not to realize that they are bringing us closer to the close minded cultures that have propagated this fear in the first place. Sad.

Our groups of protagonists are those that refuse to labor under the yoke of repression regardless of how benevolent that yoke may feel. They are brought together by a wealthy tech tycoon that plans on bringing down the Parthenon. And he’s got the tools to do it. Lovegrove goes a little Heinlein with his TITAN suits but this is a forgivable facsimile as he appears to do so with a spirit of respectful admiration in his emulation. The suits give the team of Titans the ability to go toe to toe with the rogue deities. Except for the main triumvirate of Titans, the rest are cardboard cutouts. They need to be there to fill out the mythical role call but you have a hard time relating to the entire group because of how many there are. The only unforgivable aspect of this large number of good guys is that you typically feel nothing at all when one of them dies – half the time I had to go back in the book trying to uncover who the Titan was.

Once our Titans get outfitted in their god kicking gear the story takes on a video game feel. They start with the lesser monsters in their efforts to beta test their technology. Each of these battles has a mini boss feel laced with some teenage venge-angst as select TITANS get to retaliate against the monsters that had done them harm in their past lives. This progresses to sub bosses as the TITANS advance to the demigod stage. This staged progression does not detract from the story however, it instead makes the reader feel as if they are right there accomplishing something along with our heroes. The only downside is it is very formulaic.

The formula is deftly broken before the end. The ending holds some clever twists and a not so clever explanation for the existence of the gods themselves. While the ending was somewhat disappointing you definitely feel like you got your money’s worth. Not one of the science fiction classics but still a good read.

Dark Haven – Gail Z. Martin

Somehow I keep tricking myself into reading the next book in the Chronicles of the Necromancer. I either forget how bad the previous one is or hold out hope that something interesting will happen in the next installment. Maybe it’s the name: Chronicles of the Necromancer sounds pretty badass, especially when you find out the necromancer is the good guy. I won’t make that mistake again.

The series started out innocently enough. The second son of a monarch is forced to watch the murder of his parents and younger sister by his older brother in a fairly entertaining round of Regicidal Rampage. Tris then flees for his life as big brother uses his far superior resources to hunt him down and kill him. This is where the book begins to sour. The chase seems to take forever. Tris begins to understand his powers as a necromancer but it takes too long and the journey is just not very interesting. When they come back in and take down the usurper, you’re so happy that the book is almost over that you don’t notice how boring it all is. Overall I would give round one a four out of ten. Failing grade and nothing to write home about.

Normally I would not reveal plot lines in a review, but I just don’t care with these books. I can’t even remember most of the second book or why I decided to punish myself by continuing. I bought the third, the reason for this review, well after reading the first two. I had definitely forgotten the first couple when I made that choice. I almost put it down several times in the reading but muscled my way through for sheer kitsch value at the end. Unfortunately, it’s not purposefully bad. Otherwise it might have made a good campy extreme out of itself.

The biggest insult is how bad the writing is. I honestly wish I knew how some of these things get through a publisher. It’s not easy to get published yet crap like this is more prevalent than it has any right to be. The dialog is blander than Buzz the Bee on the back of a box of Honey Nut Cheerios. I’m afraid to say I don’t think Ms. Martin has ever heard the words metaphor or simile.

Unfortunately, I did buy the fourth one when I bought the third (I usually pick up series in twos), so I have to decide what to do with it. I’m thinking dog toy.