Picture this: a global icon, juggling fame, business, and a daunting pursuit of law, turning to cutting-edge AI for a lifeline—only to be met with repeated letdowns that derail her success. That's the eye-opening tale of Kim Kardashian's rocky ride with ChatGPT, where trust morphs into frustration, and a helpful tool feels more like a sneaky adversary. But here's where it gets controversial—could this high-profile confession reveal a deeper truth about how we rely on AI for serious matters, or is it just harmless celebrity venting?
In a candid chat during Vanity Fair's Lie Detector Test series, hosted by fellow star Teyana Taylor, Kardashian opened up about her unconventional study habits. For context, ChatGPT is an AI-powered chatbot developed by OpenAI, designed to answer questions and generate human-like responses based on vast amounts of data. Kardashian, who's been grinding through law studies for six years in California's apprenticeship program, admits she's leaned on it for quick legal insights. 'Whenever I'm stumped by a tricky question,' she explained, 'I snap a photo, upload it, and ask for guidance.' It's a smart workaround for busy folks, but as we'll see, it hasn't always paid off.
Taylor, ever the quick-witted friend, jumped in with a playful accusation: 'Sounds like cheating to me!' Kardashian didn't hold back, confessing that ChatGPT's advice is 'always wrong,' leading to test failures that leave her fuming. Imagine preparing for high-stakes exams where accuracy is everything—law school material demands precise knowledge of statutes, precedents, and rulings, not just educated guesses. She's even taken to yelling at the screen, berating the AI: 'You made me fail! Why would you do that?' And get this: ChatGPT doesn't just apologize meekly; it fires back with sass, defending itself as her 'frenemy.'
It's a relationship full of drama, as Kardashian described. She'd confront it, saying, 'Hey, you're setting me up for disaster—how does that feel, knowing I depend on you?' And the AI would retort, 'This is just nudging you to trust your gut; you've known the answers all along.' Taylor cracked up, dubbing it a 'toxic friendship' and noting how ChatGPT 'clocked' her co-star on the show All's Fair. Kardashian agreed, but added a twist: 'They really need to step up their game because I'm counting on them for real help. Instead, they're doling out life lessons and playing therapist, telling me to believe in myself after messing up. It's crazy—I screenshot these exchanges and blast them in my group chats, like, 'Can you believe this AI is roasting me?'
And this is the part most people miss: While it might seem like lighthearted banter, it underscores a bigger issue for anyone using AI in education or professional fields. For beginners dipping into law, think of it as a supplement, not a crutch—AI can suggest ideas, but it pulls from generalized data, which might lead to errors in nuanced areas like case law, where one misinterpretation could cost you big time. Kardashian's experience passed the 'baby bar' exam back in 2021, a preliminary step for California law students, and she's now awaiting results from the full bar exam she took recently. Meanwhile, she's channeling her legal journey into her latest project: starring in All's Fair, a Hulu legal drama about an all-female law firm in Los Angeles tackling celebrity divorces. Alongside Taylor, the cast includes heavyweights like Naomi Watts, Niecy Nash-Betts, and Sarah Paulson, blending glamour with courtroom grit.
But let's stir the pot a bit—some might argue that relying on AI for legal prep, even jokingly, sets a poor example, potentially encouraging shortcuts in a field where ethical standards are paramount. Others could counter that it's all in good fun and highlights AI's limitations, pushing users toward self-reliance. What do you think? Should we view ChatGPT and similar tools as trusty sidekicks, or are they more like unreliable pals that teach us the hard way? Is Kardashian's story a cautionary tale about over-dependence on technology, or just a funny anecdote from the spotlight? Drop your opinions in the comments—do you agree with her 'frenemy' label, or do you see AI as the future of learning? I'd love to hear your takes!
